Samuel E. Morison, "The History of United States Naval Operations in World War II," Volumes XII and XIV, Ammunition data is taken from Garzke and Dulin, pp. it is VERY hard(tough still possible) to citadel montana. Way too much Bounce even on BB showing his Broadside. To compete with the United States Air Force and the United States Army, which had developed nuclear bombs and nuclear shells for use on the battlefield, the Navy began a top-secret program to develop Mk. "Rearming in a Vacuum: United States Navy Intelligence and the Japanese Capital Ship Threat, 1936–1945". The Oerlikon 20 mm AA gun remained the primary anti-aircraft weapon of the United States Navy until the introduction of the 40 mm Bofors AA gun in 1943. Artist’s impression of the Montana class Battleship. Press J to jump to the feed. The Montana-class battleships were planned as successors of the Iowa class for the United States Navy, to be slower but larger, better armored, and with superior firepower. The Montana class battleships would have been one of the most powerful dreadnoughts ever to be launched, rivaled only by the Yamato class battleships. - Yamato' s guns are so big that they can do high damage at nearly every angles. While designers considered making the Montana class faster, they decided that firepower and armor were more important. This resulted in a gun system set to British standards (now known as the Standard System) with interchangeable ammunition, which simplified the logistics situation for World War II. And before there was space on shipyards it had been realized that BBs were obsolete and it was better to keep building more of previously mentioned ships. ", United States naval ship classes of World War II, In theory, the US Navy could resume construction of battleships by building the. They were subsequently phased out in favor of the heavier 40 mm Bofors AA guns. Armoring is the largest difference between the two classes. This is because of Renaissance aircraft. The Iowa was meant to be a fast interceptor to guard against cruisers and fast battleships. The belief in the connection between the Iowa and Montana classes likely stems from their similar appearance and use of the same main armament. It was also one of the largest naval repair facilities available. - Secondries ; Yamato max 9.8 and Montana max 7.2. at the current state. So it’s not really a paper project unlike a lot of the other ships.  This shift in policy meant that the Montana class would have been the only World War II–era US battleships to be adequately armored against guns of the same power as their own. Gunboats. So even with smaller guns they were almost identical in terms of penetration with the super heavy AP round. Yeah, it's too bad. And its always someone else fokusing you and bringing that extra dmg and its hard to find such a perfect 1 v 1 situation in random. Damn you to hell von braun! 13 HC (High-Capacity – referring to the large bursting charge) shell was available. Had they been completed, the Montanas would have been gun-for-gun the most powerful battleships the United States had constructed, and the only US battleship class that would have rivaled the Imperial Japanese Navy battleships Yamato and Musashi in armament, armor, and displacement. Intended armament would have been twelve 16-inch (406 mm) Mark 7 guns in four 3-gun turrets, up from the nine Mark 7 guns in three turrets used by the Iowa class. -Heal - that is intended. Although the Navy knew little about the Yamato class, some rumors regarding the new Japanese battleships placed main gun battery caliber at 18 inches (457 mm). This is a side view comparing the final 1942 Montana design with Yamato Musashi as she appeared in 1944 which is only produce overpen most of time if u aim for that overmatch. The Montana was a larger Iowa class battleship with an extra turret. -Reducing Yamatos 18'' pen force will make it useless. It depends on how well she can perform her role. The secondary armament battery of ten two-gun turrets was also changed to mount the 5-inch (127 mm)/54 cal guns instead of the 5-inch/38 cal guns used on the Iowas. North Korea is likely as not developing nuke arty since they have so many of those around, SHS shells are used starting from NC and Baltimore , penetration and damage wise it is the best of the tier , but the gun arc leave much to be desired as in game range do not allow these shells to do plunging fire on decks at acceptable engagement range, No, the Iowa did actually have nuclear shells designed for it, it's the W23 nuclear artillery shell if I'm not mistaken. If commissioned, the ships were expected to mount a considerable array of Oerlikon 20 mm and Bofors 40 mm anti-aircraft weapons. The turrets would have rotated about 300° at about 4° per second and could even be fired back beyond the beam, which is sometimes called "over the shoulder". In the three years after the Yamato was laid down, the Americans had already launched or commissioned several North Carolina and South Dakota class Battleships. Historically US AP rounds were far superior to the IJN. Louisiana would have been the third ship to bear that name had she been commissioned. The Oerlikon 20 mm anti-aircraft cannon was one of the most heavily produced anti-aircraft guns of World War II; the US alone manufactured a total of 124,735 of these guns. If it's close-up, then actually getting close while the target still has ~72k+ HP is noteworthy, and getting 7 cits close up needs a straight up waterline shot which would need to be quite ideal. No longer restricted by treaty displacement limits, naval architects were able to increase armor protection for the new BB65 design schemes, enabling the ships to withstand enemy fire equivalent to their own guns' ammunition. Typically it augmented existing fire control equipment not designed for electronic inputs.  For unarmored targets and shore bombardment, the 1,900 lb (862 kg) Mk. Vs cruisers, Montana shoots 3 more shells and is obviously a bit better for killing them.  The guns would have had an elevation range of −5° to +45°, moving at up to 12° per second. Vs carriers. So I've had enough of bashing my head against the wall so I figured I would ask for others opinions before the salt content in my body eclipses water. Now add on flags and captain skills to that, and the difference becomes even larger.The heal and the penetration is what makes Yamato so much better than Montana.Either the Yamato's penetration should be reduced or Montana's increased.Also, one thing I noticed. Yamato´s 18" guns should do at least 1k-2k more AP damage. These were born from the nuclear deterrence that had begun to shape the US armed forces at the start of the Cold War. Yes, They were the only other battleship capable of engaging the Yamato on equal terms. actually. The Montana has 2 aircraft launchers and 7 carrieable aircraft. Naval Historical Center. Russia was more fond of the concept that NATO though , and that influence those that has ties with former USSR. Yamato have more secondary turrets and when fully upgraded it is really effective to the enemy. Over the course of the war, new evidence slowly allowed the navy to better understand what it was that it was up against. By Obviously, this makes Yamato much more durable. They weren’t ultimate weapons conjured up to single-handedly win the war, just simple units designed to fill a role particular role in warfare. Both the Iowa and Essex classes had been given higher priorities: the Iowas as they were far along enough in construction and urgently needed to operate alongside the Essex-class carriers and defend them with 5-inch, 40 mm, and 20 mm AA guns, and the Essexes because of their ability to launch aircraft to gain and maintain air supremacy over the islands in the Pacific and intercept warships of the Imperial Japanese Navy. After armor, speed shows another sizable difference between the classes. Yamato has better accuracy. The Kingfisher's high operating ceiling of 13,000 feet (4.0 km) made it well-suited for its primary mission: to observe the fall of shot from a battleship's guns and radio corrections back to the ship. ", "NavSource Online: Battleship Photo Archive (BB-67 USS Montana)", "Montana class battleships end of the line", "Information on Options for Naval Surface Fire Support", "Development of the World's Fastest Battleships", "What did the USN know about Yamato and when?  The ammunition storage for the 5-inch/54 cal gun was 500 rounds per turret, and the guns could fire at targets nearly 26,000 yd (24 km) away at a 45° angle. Also, the Yamato was known to the US Navy at the time of design. - While playing with Montana when you see that if there is a Yamato at the other team, you always feel desperate. FIxed. The Navy needed all ships to be able to travel to that yard and the Brooklyn bridge was the largest obstacle along the way.  Four additional battleships (with hull numbers BB-63, BB-64, BB-65, and BB-66) were approved for construction in 1940, with the last two intended to be the first ships of the Montana class. [N 17], "When you're penetrating armor, there is a thing called frontal density – it's not just the weight of the shell, it's the weight of the shell trying to punch a hole through [the armor]. God damn nazis inventing guided missiles and making long range gunnery pointless!!!!!! Even IJN halted construction of third Yamato-class ship after British Prince of Wales and Repulse were sinked by air attack. [N 1]. Yamato has the Damage while Montana has the Reload Speed. , The secondary armament for Montana and her sisters was to be twenty 5-inch (127 mm)/54 cal guns housed in ten turrets along the superstructure island of the battleship; five on the starboard side and five on the port. [N 7], The final BB67-4 design for the Montana-class battleships was 890 feet 0 inches (271.27 m) long at the waterline and 921 feet 3 inches (280.80 m) long overall.  This analog computer would have been used to direct the fire from the battleship's big guns, taking into account several factors such as the speed of the targeted ship, the time it takes for a projectile to travel, and air resistance to the shells fired at a target. So this comes down to Technology. At an 85° angle, the guns could hit an aerial target at over 50,000 ft (15,000 m). For more details regarding the Montana, check the Wikipedia article, which I have recently revised.  Although freed of the beam restriction from the extant Panama Canal, the length and height of the BB65 designs had to take into account one of the shipyards at which they were to be built: the New York Navy Yard slipways could not handle the construction of a ship more than 58,000 long tons (59,000 t), and vessels built there had to be low enough to clear the Brooklyn Bridge at low tide. Unlike the Iowa, the Montana was protected from its own guns. People should stop thinking of it as a BB that shoots AP and begin spamming that HE and gang up on yamatos like good CA captains. She would have had the heaviest broadside of any battleship in history. Consequently, the US Navy chose to cancel the Montana class in favor of more urgently needed aircraft carriers, amphibious and anti-submarine vessels.  They fired 2,700 lb (1,200 kg) armor-piercing projectiles at a muzzle velocity of 2,500 ft/s (762 m/s), or 1,900 lb (860 kg) high-capacity projectiles at 2,690 ft/s (820 m/s), with a range of up to 24 mi (39 km). In July 1943, the construction of the Montana class was finally canceled after the Navy fully accepted the shift in naval warfare from surface engagements to air supremacy and from battleships to aircraft carriers.  Design study of the BB65-8 scheme for a 33-knot battleship resulted in standard displacement over 66,000 long tons (67,000 t), waterline length of 1,100 feet (340 m), and required 320,000 shaft horsepower (239 MW); by returning the BB65 design to the slower maximum speed, the standard displacement and waterline length of the ships could be reduced to a more practical 58,000 long tons (59,000 t) and 930 feet (280 m) respectively as exemplified by the BB65-5 scheme. Even if the Montana has accuracy module installed and the Yamato doesn't. Damn, you're right. Also getting into a 1v1 with a Yamato is one the last things you should do in the Montana I've found I'm better off deleting the CA's and low tier BB's while leaving the Yamato mostly to be HE spammed to death by your own CA's, while saying this if he is broadside pump that accurate AP into him.
Metallica S&m2 Album Release Date,
Red Belts Bjj,
Let's Go For A Walk In French,
Propane Gas Bottle Fittings,
Coffee Scented Candles,